[LLVMdev] Install fails due to missing 'pax' tool

Reid Spencer reid at x10sys.com
Wed Feb 16 08:18:00 PST 2005


Despite previous advertising, you want version 1.300 of Makefile.rules.
The previous version had a bug in it for installing config files (llvmc)

Reid.

On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 08:14, Reid Spencer wrote:
> Vladimir,
> 
> I believe I've corrected this situation with version 1.299 of
> Makefile.rules. It now only uses find and install to do the installation
> of the header files. pax isn't used any more. Hopefully this helps you.
> 
> Reid.
> 
> On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 04:18, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I've just tries make && make install on a fresh CVS tree, and get:
> > 
> >    llvm[0]: Installing include files
> >    /bin/sh: line 1: pax: command not found
> > 
> > Two questions.
> > 
> > 1. Why install process requires some nonstandard tool? Is it possible to get 
> > away without it.
> > 
> > 2. autoconf/configure.ac has this:
> > 
> >    AC_PATH_PROG(PAX,  [pax],  [pax])
> > 
> > but Makefile.rules uses plain 'pax', not $(PAX). Why autoconf test is needed, 
> > then?
> > 
> > - Volodya
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > LLVM Developers mailing list
> > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> > http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20050216/21c5ce2a/attachment.sig>


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list