[LLVMdev] To APR Or Not To APR. That is the question.
Vladimir Prus
ghost at cs.msu.su
Wed Sep 15 23:45:29 PDT 2004
John Criswell wrote:
> Okay.
>
> We excised boost because we were only using a small subset of it that we
> could have written ourselves. If boost as a whole does what we need, I
> think it could become an option again (although, IIRC, boost does not
> have uniform copyrights like Apache does, we was giving me a headache,
> so that might be an issue).
Regarding copyrights:
1. All of them fulfill Boost copyright requirements, which means they all as
as free as possible.
2. An effort is going on to move all Boost to a unified license
(http://boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt) and a lot of process is made already.
Just FYI.
- Volodya
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list