[LLVMdev] Type uint64_t required but not found

[Reid Spencer]

Bill/Henrik,

I've committed Bill's suggestion which is a little safer.

Reid.

Bill Wendling wrote:

> Henrik Bach wrote:
> } Hi John,
> } 
> } configure still exits, when checking for uint64_t. I've attached a patch, 
> } that properly will fix it. Either uint64_t or u_int64_t will succeed:
> } 
> } Index: configure.ac
> } ===================================================================
> } RCS file: /var/cvs/llvm/llvm/autoconf/configure.ac,v
> } retrieving revision 1.106
> } diff -u -r1.106 configure.ac
> } --- configure.ac	2 Sep 2004 18:44:44 -0000	1.106
> } +++ configure.ac	2 Sep 2004 20:13:17 -0000
> } @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@
> } AC_TYPE_PID_T
> } AC_TYPE_SIZE_T
> } AC_CHECK_TYPES([int64_t],,AC_MSG_ERROR([Type int64_t required but not 
> } found]))
> } -AC_CHECK_TYPES([uint64_t],,AC_MSG_ERROR([Type uint64_t required but not 
> } found]))
> } +AC_CHECK_TYPES([uint64_t])
> } AC_CHECK_TYPES([u_int64_t])
> } AC_HEADER_TIME
> } AC_STRUCT_TM
> } 
> Maybe instead of just assuming one will be there you can do something
> like this:
> 
> 
> AC_CHECK_TYPES([uint64_t],,
>                AC_CHECK_TYPES([u_int64_t],,
>                               AC_MSG_ERROR([Type uint64_t or u_int64_t ...])))
> 
> I know I just jumped into the middle of this discussion, but at least
> this will error out if something drastic happens. :)
> 
> -bw
>