[LLVMdev] Nested functions

[Chris Lattner]

On Sun, 21 Nov 2004, Dirk Muysers wrote:

> Was there already some reflection about how to lower the concept of nested
> functions (and the corresponding static links) into llvm?

This was discussed back in August, which discusses it, provides a solution
and an example:
http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2004-August/001828.html
http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2004-August/001829.html
http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2004-August/001834.html
http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2004-August/001836.html

I don't think that we need anything added to LLVM to support nested
functions.

-Chris

-- 
http://llvm.org/
http://nondot.org/sabre/