[LLVMdev] -Woverloaded-virtual

[Reid Spencer]

On Thu, 2004-06-24 at 10:54, Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Reid Spencer wrote:
> 
> > I asked Chris about this months ago but there was little interest in
> > changing it.
> 
> I thought we were talking about -Weffc++ at that time?

No, that was recently. I was talking about months ago (January this
year?). it was a small conversation.

> 
> > Perhaps we need to file a bug to take care of the warnings it produces
> > so that LLVm is overloaded virtual clean, then we can turn on checking
> > for overloaded virtuals.
> 
> This sounds like a great way to do it.

yeah, I'll file the bug.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20040624/6afbfc0d/attachment.sig>