[LLVMdev] ConstantInt::getRawValue
Chris Lattner
sabre at nondot.org
Thu Jun 17 12:14:01 PDT 2004
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> Is there are reason why ConstantInt::getRawValue method can't be moved one
> step into class hierarchy, into ConstantIntegral::getRawValue
>
> The reason I'd like this is that to handle both ConstantInt and ConstantBool,
> I need the following:
>
> if (ConstantInt* CI = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(V)) {
> BuildMI(*MBB, IPt, NM::MOVE, 1, Reg).addImm(CI->getRawValue());
> } if (ConstantBool* CB = dyn_cast<ConstantBool>(V)) {
> BuildMI(*MBB, IPt, NM::MOVE, 1, Reg).addImm(CI->getalue());
> } ...
>
> If getRawValue is moved to ConstantIntegral, I'd simply write
>
> if (ConstantIntegral* CI = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(V)) {
> BuildMI(*MBB, IPt, NM::MOVE, 1, Reg).addImm(CI->getRawValue());
> } ...
>
> which is a bit nicer. Of course, if you think it's a good idea, I can send a
> patch.
Sure that sounds great. It increases the size of the ConstantBool class,
but since there are only two instances of it ever created, I think we can
live with this. :)
-Chris
--
http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/
http://www.nondot.org/~sabre/Projects/
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list