[LLVMdev] [patch] native AMD64 support

[Reid Spencer]

On Wed, 2004-12-22 at 22:40, Misha Brukman wrote:
> If you want to work on something, getting LLC to produce AMD64 code
> would be the first step, and getting the JIT to work would be the
> second.  I am assuming native 32-bit binaries will run, just slower, so
> this is an "optimization". :)  

I believe x86 BE is due for "sub-target" support to handle variations in
the 386, 486, 586, ... instruction sets. Could amd64 be thought of this
way? Or, is it different enough that its a new target?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20041223/63d4adf0/attachment.sig>