[LLVMdev] Type uint64_t required but not found
John Criswell
criswell at cs.uiuc.edu
Tue Aug 31 13:58:23 PDT 2004
Reid Spencer wrote:
> Well, if it doesn't break anything else, I'd fix the header file. The
> standard type name is supposed to uint64_t not u_int64_t. I would just
> change the header file to define both of them, something like:
>
> typedef u_int64_t uint64_t;
>
> You could do that in /usr/include/types.h, or we could add it to a
> header file in llvm/include/Config, ifdef'd for Interix.
I think that we should add a check for u_int64_t and do a typedef in
llvm/include/Config (or something similar). I don't think we can expect
Interix users to correct their header files (especially since the next
Interix upgrade will just unfix it again).
-- John T.
--
*********************************************************************
* John T. Criswell Email: criswell at uiuc.edu *
* Research Programmer *
* University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign *
* *
* "It's today!" said Piglet. "My favorite day," said Pooh. *
*********************************************************************
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list