[LLVMdev] is this code really JITed and/or optimized=?koi8-r?Q?=3F=20?=..

[Chris Lattner]

On Sat, 14 Aug 2004, Reid Spencer wrote:

> ick! Is there a bugzilla on this?

Nope, feel free.

-Chris


> On Sat, 2004-08-14 at 13:49, Chris Lattner wrote:
>
> > If you look at the 3 lines above the assert that is failing, you'll see
> > this:
> >
> >     // FIXME: This code should handle a couple of common cases efficiently, but
> >     // it should also implement the general case by code-gening a new anonymous
> >     // nullary function to call.
> >
> > Basically it's saying that we only support one argument functions that
> > take an integer right now.  This is a bug/suboptimality, hence the FIXME.
> >
> > There are several different ways to fix the problem, as hinted at by the
> > comment.  In the short term, adding something like this:
> >
> >   } else if (ArgValues.empty()) {
> >     void (*PF)() = (void(*)())getPointerToFunction(F);
> >     assert(PF && "Pointer to fn's code was null after getPointerToFunction");
> >     PF();
> >
> > before the "else" case, should fix the issue for you.  That code is
> > basically only smart enough to run 'main', but could be enhanced by
> > someone interested in it to handle the general case.
> >
> > -Chris
>

-Chris

-- 
http://llvm.org/
http://nondot.org/sabre/