[LLVMdev] Compiler Driver Decisions

[Reid Spencer]

On Mon, 2004-08-02 at 18:12, Tanya Brethour wrote:

> I think that we can really pick any name that we want. We don't have to go
> along with "tradition" and name it "cc". Personally, compiler collection
> is kinda lame anyways. I'm all about something short though, so "llvmc" is
> my vote.

A lot of the names are fine with me, I'm just trying to find a crowd
pleaser.  However, brevity is high on my list too.  How about "doit" :)

> Ok. So i voted, so now can we tally the votes and put this discussion to
> an end? ;)

I think I need to wait for Misha and Vikram to weigh in on this
discussion before we take it to a vote. Hopefully, there will be some
consensus on the name soon :)

Reid.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20040802/89088788/attachment.sig>