[LLVMdev] An LLVM 1.3 Request

[Reid Spencer]

On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 20:05, Alkis Evlogimenos wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 21:58, Reid Spencer wrote:
> > On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 19:10, Chris Lattner wrote:
> > This is completely opposite the way I work. If I had CVS access, I would
> > do the whole change in a branch. This would include fixing all
> > makefiles, moving all files, creating/fixing configure scripts, and
> > running all regressions to make sure it worked. I would then check in
> > the branch, merge mainline into it again and re-test. Once I was synched
> > with mainline and everything checked out, I'd commit again.  The branch
> > would be verified independently by someone else before being merged back
> > to mainline.
> 
> It makes you wish we were using bitkeeper or arch, doesn't it? :-)

In the interest of good developer/institution relations, all I can say
is: "No comment." :)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20040413/eddbbcb7/attachment.sig>