[llvm] [OCaml] Use DataLayout instead of string in (set_)data_layout (PR #228445)
Ramkumar Ramachandra via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sat Oct 3 04:25:24 PDT 2026
================
@@ -328,14 +328,14 @@ value llvm_set_target_triple(value Trip, value M) {
return Val_unit;
}
-/* llmodule -> string */
+/* llmodule -> DataLayout.t */
value llvm_data_layout(value M) {
- return caml_copy_string(LLVMGetDataLayout(Module_val(M)));
+ return llvm_alloc_data_layout(LLVMGetModuleDataLayout(Module_val(M)));
}
-/* string -> llmodule -> unit */
+/* DataLayout.t -> llmodule -> unit */
value llvm_set_data_layout(value Layout, value M) {
- LLVMSetDataLayout(Module_val(M), String_val(Layout));
+ LLVMSetModuleDataLayout(Module_val(M), DataLayout_val(Layout));
----------------
artagnon wrote:
Can you kindly explain this change as well? Has the function name changed from LLVMSetDataLayout -> LLVMSetModuleDataLayout in some invisible manner?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/228445
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list