[llvm] [X86] Fix TC_RETURN operand type for the x32 ABI (PR #228281)

[via llvm-commits]

github-actions[bot] wrote:

<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->


:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code. :warning:

<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>

``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff origin/main HEAD --extensions cpp -- llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86SelectionDAGInfo.cpp --diff_from_common_commit
``````````

:warning:
The reproduction instructions above might return results for more than one PR
in a stack if you are using a stacked PR workflow. You can limit the results by
changing `origin/main` to the base branch/commit you want to compare against.
:warning:

</details>

<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>

``````````diff
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86SelectionDAGInfo.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86SelectionDAGInfo.cpp
index 00e214f52..0002d93d8 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86SelectionDAGInfo.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86SelectionDAGInfo.cpp
@@ -112,8 +112,8 @@ void X86SelectionDAGInfo::verifyTargetNode(const SelectionDAG &DAG,
                     Target.getOpcode() == ISD::TargetGlobalAddress ||
                     Target.getOpcode() == ISD::ExternalSymbol ||
                     Target.getOpcode() == ISD::TargetExternalSymbol;
-    bool WantI64 = IsDirect ? Subtarget.isTarget64BitLP64()
-                            : Subtarget.is64Bit();
+    bool WantI64 =
+        IsDirect ? Subtarget.isTarget64BitLP64() : Subtarget.is64Bit();
     EVT ExpectedVT = WantI64 ? MVT::i64 : MVT::i32;
     EVT VT = Target.getValueType();
     if (VT != ExpectedVT)

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/228281