[llvm] [X86] Use integer VT for second argument of X86ISD::VPERMILPV in combineConcatVectorOps. (PR #228257)

[via llvm-commits]

github-actions[bot] wrote:

<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->


:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code. :warning:

<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>

``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff origin/main HEAD --extensions cpp -- llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp --diff_from_common_commit
``````````

:warning:
The reproduction instructions above might return results for more than one PR
in a stack if you are using a stacked PR workflow. You can limit the results by
changing `origin/main` to the base branch/commit you want to compare against.
:warning:

</details>

<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>

``````````diff
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
index a0e221048..81af171fd 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
@@ -61508,10 +61508,9 @@ static SDValue combineConcatVectorOps(const SDLoc &DL, MVT VT,
         SDValue Concat0 = CombineSubOperand(VT, Ops, 0);
         SDValue Concat1 = CombineSubOperand(IntVT, Ops, 1);
         if (Concat0 || Concat1)
-          return DAG.getNode(Opcode, DL, VT,
-                             Concat0 ? Concat0 : ConcatSubOperand(VT, Ops, 0),
-                             Concat1 ? Concat1
-                                      : ConcatSubOperand(IntVT, Ops, 1));
+          return DAG.getNode(
+              Opcode, DL, VT, Concat0 ? Concat0 : ConcatSubOperand(VT, Ops, 0),
+              Concat1 ? Concat1 : ConcatSubOperand(IntVT, Ops, 1));
       }
       break;
     case X86ISD::PSHUFB:

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/228257