[llvm] [Transforms][Utils] Add LoopSplit for iteration-space loop splitting (PR #217232)
Ashutosh Nema via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Sep 21 22:34:36 PDT 2026
================
@@ -0,0 +1,590 @@
+//===- LoopSplit.cpp - Split a loop's iteration space ---------------------===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+//
+// Splits a counted loop's iteration space into a chain of per-partition
+// sub-loops. See LoopSplit.h for the high-level usage guidelines.
+//
+// Structure produced for partitions [S0,E0], [S1,E1], ... where E is the loop's
+// last iteration and each clamped end sel_i is min(E_i, E), or max descending:
+//
+// guard0: ; every S_i and sel_i is computed here
+// if (S0 <= sel0) goto preheader0 else goto guard1
+// loop0: ... ; latch iterates while i < sel0
+// exit0 -> guard1
+// guard1:
+// if (S1 <= sel1) goto preheader1 else goto guard2
+// loop1: ... ; latch iterates while i < sel1
+// exit1 -> guard2
+// ...
+// final.exit:
+//
+// Each guard holds the "S_i <= sel_i" check and skips an empty partition by
+// falling through to the next guard. All S_i/sel_i are materialized once in
+// guard0, and the end clamp keeps the "runs at least once" iteration in the
+// right partition.
+//
+// The latch keeps iterating while the value the next iteration would use is
+// still in the partition. That is written as the strict "i < sel_i" on the
+// induction PHI rather than "i + 1 <= sel_i" on the step value; the two agree
+// because legality analysis has established that the space does not wrap, and
+// the strict form never forms i + 1, so it remains a real test even when sel_i
+// is the last value of the type, where the inclusive one would be a tautology
+// and the partition would never exit.
+//
+// A descending (step -1) loop uses the same structure mirrored: partitions run
+// high-to-low and the clamp and predicates flip (>=/>).
+//
+// Usage guidelines:
+// - Caller bounds must not wrap the induction type. The clamp absorbs a bound
+// past the runtime trip count, and legality analysis reserves the one step
+// past the induction start that an empty partition needs, but a bound
+// reaching any further wraps in the bound arithmetic and cannot be repaired
+// here.
+// - Bounds must be loop-invariant: they are expanded in guard0, so a bound
+// depending on a value defined inside the loop cannot be placed.
+// - The partitions must tile the original iteration space exactly -- same
+// iterations, same order -- so the split preserves program behaviour.
+//
+// The transform is structural: inside a partition it only seeds the induction
+// PHI with that partition's start and replaces the latch test. It never
+// rebuilds a value that flows between partitions, so no SSA reconstruction is
+// needed.
+//
+// Not yet supported, and rejected during legality analysis: loop-carried
+// values, values that escape the loop (exit values), non-unit and non-integer
+// inductions, top-tested loops, and multiple exits. Also rejected is an
+// induction start at the extreme of the iteration direction, which leaves
+// nowhere to put a boundary. An induction *end* at that extreme is fine,
+// because the latch stays strict.
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/LoopSplit.h"
+#include "llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h"
+#include "llvm/Analysis/LoopInfo.h"
+#include "llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.h"
+#include "llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionExpressions.h"
+#include "llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionPatternMatch.h"
+#include "llvm/IR/BasicBlock.h"
+#include "llvm/IR/Dominators.h"
+#include "llvm/IR/Function.h"
+#include "llvm/IR/IRBuilder.h"
+#include "llvm/IR/Instructions.h"
+#include "llvm/IR/ProfDataUtils.h"
+#include "llvm/Support/Debug.h"
+#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/BasicBlockUtils.h"
+#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/Cloning.h"
+#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/LoopUtils.h"
+#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/ScalarEvolutionExpander.h"
+#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/ValueMapper.h"
+#include <optional>
+
+using namespace llvm;
+using namespace llvm::SCEVPatternMatch;
+
+#define DEBUG_TYPE "loop-split"
+
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+// LoopSplit - construction, partition list, induction analysis
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+/// Per-split() scratch shared by the phase helpers; lives for one split() call.
+/// Everything derived from the induction lives on LoopSplit itself, filled in
+/// by legality analysis; this holds only what the transform creates.
+struct LoopSplit::SplitState {
+ // Partition 0 reuses the original loop's preheader, exit, and entry guard;
+ // those blocks live in Partitions[0] rather than being duplicated here.
+ BasicBlock *FinalExit = nullptr; // where the partition chain converges.
+ Loop *OuterLoop = nullptr; // parent of the new blocks, if any.
+ PHINode *Induction = nullptr; // the loop's induction variable.
+ MDNode *OrigLoopID = nullptr; // !llvm.loop on the loop before splitting.
+};
+
+// Record a new partition with the given inclusive iteration range.
+void LoopSplit::addPartition(const SCEV *Start, const SCEV *End) {
+ assert(InductionEnd && "addPartition() requires prior legality analysis");
+ // The bounds are combined with the induction end and expanded in its type. A
+ // mismatch would otherwise surface either as a bare "Operand types don't
+ // match!" from inside ScalarEvolution, or worse, as a silent cast.
+ assert(Start->getType() == InductionEnd->getType() &&
+ End->getType() == InductionEnd->getType() &&
+ "partition bounds must have the induction type");
+ if (Partitions.empty()) {
+ assert((Start == InductionStart ||
+ SE->isKnownPredicate(ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ, Start, InductionStart)) &&
+ "first partition Start must match the induction start");
+ }
+ Partitions.emplace_back(Start, End);
+}
+
+// Return the induction's add-recurrence, or null unless the induction is an
+// integer with a unit step that the latch compares.
+static const SCEVAddRecExpr *analyzeInduction(Loop *L, ScalarEvolution *SE) {
+ ICmpInst *LatchCmp = L->getLatchCmpInst();
+
+ // SCEV's induction variable, restricted to a unit-step affine recurrence.
+ PHINode *Induction = L->getInductionVariable(*SE);
+ if (!Induction)
+ return nullptr;
+ // Partition bounds are integer arithmetic on the induction type, so a loop
+ // whose only induction is a pointer is out of scope.
+ if (!Induction->getType()->isIntegerTy())
+ return nullptr;
+ const SCEV *IndSCEV = SE->getSCEV(Induction);
+ // Match an affine add-recurrence and capture its constant step; accept a unit
+ // step in either direction: +1 (ascending) or -1 (descending).
+ const APInt *Step;
+ if (!match(IndSCEV, m_scev_AffineAddRec(m_SCEV(), m_scev_APInt(Step))))
+ return nullptr;
+ if (!Step->isOne() && !Step->isAllOnes())
+ return nullptr;
+ const auto *AR = cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(IndSCEV);
+
+ // The induction's "next" value (i + 1), produced in the latch.
+ auto *StepInst = dyn_cast<Instruction>(
+ Induction->getIncomingValueForBlock(L->getLoopLatch()));
+ if (!StepInst)
+ return nullptr;
+
+ // One compare operand must be the induction, either the PHI or its step. The
+ // rebuilt latch always compares the PHI, so which operand it was is not used.
+ if (any_of(LatchCmp->operands(),
+ [&](Value *Op) { return Op == Induction || Op == StepInst; }))
+ return AR;
+ return nullptr;
+}
+
+// Decide whether the iteration ordering is signed or unsigned; returns the
+// signedness, or nullopt if it cannot be proven.
+static std::optional<bool> computeSignedness(ScalarEvolution &SE, Loop *L,
+ const SCEVAddRecExpr *IndAR) {
+ ICmpInst::Predicate P = L->getLatchCmpInst()->getPredicate();
+ // A relational predicate gives the ordering directly; for eq/ne fall back to
+ // the recurrence's no-wrap flags.
+ if (ICmpInst::isRelational(P))
+ return ICmpInst::isSigned(P);
+ if (IndAR->hasNoSignedWrap() && IndAR->hasNoUnsignedWrap()) {
+ const ConstantRange UR = SE.getUnsignedRange(IndAR);
+ const ConstantRange SR = SE.getSignedRange(IndAR);
+ if (UR.isFullSet() && SR.isFullSet()) {
+ LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << DEBUG_TYPE
+ ": ambiguous iteration ordering with both nsw and nuw\n");
+ return std::nullopt;
+ }
+ if (!SR.isFullSet())
+ return true;
+ if (!UR.isFullSet())
+ return false;
+ LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << DEBUG_TYPE
+ ": cannot prove iteration ordering signedness\n");
+ return std::nullopt;
+ }
+ if (IndAR->hasNoSignedWrap())
+ return true;
+ if (IndAR->hasNoUnsignedWrap())
+ return false;
+ LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << DEBUG_TYPE
+ ": cannot prove iteration ordering signedness\n");
+ return std::nullopt;
+}
+
+// Prove \p Pred between \p LHS and \p RHS on entry to \p L, with loop guards
+// folded in so a bound fixed by a dominating condition is seen.
+static bool isEntryGuardedByCond(ScalarEvolution &SE, Loop *L,
+ ICmpInst::Predicate Pred, const SCEV *LHS,
+ const SCEV *RHS) {
+ return SE.isLoopEntryGuardedByCond(L, Pred, SE.applyLoopGuards(LHS, L),
+ SE.applyLoopGuards(RHS, L));
+}
+
+// Latch "keep iterating" predicate, comparing the induction PHI against the
+// partition end: `i < sel` ascending, `i > sel` descending.
+static ICmpInst::Predicate continuePredicate(bool Signed, bool Descending) {
+ ICmpInst::Predicate P = Descending ? ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT : ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT;
+ return Signed ? ICmpInst::getSignedPredicate(P) : P;
+}
+
+// Guard "enter this partition" predicate: the latch test made non-strict, so
+// `start <= sel` ascending and `start >= sel` descending. Also used during
+// legality analysis to prove the iteration space is monotonic.
+static ICmpInst::Predicate guardPredicate(bool Signed, bool Descending) {
+ return ICmpInst::getNonStrictPredicate(continuePredicate(Signed, Descending));
+}
+
+struct LoopSplitAnalysis {
+ const SCEV *InductionStart;
+ const SCEV *InductionEnd;
+ bool InductionIsSigned;
+ bool Descending;
+};
+
+// Check every structural precondition and record the induction analysis.
+static std::optional<LoopSplitAnalysis>
+analyzeLegality(Loop *L, LoopInfo *LI, ScalarEvolution *SE, DominatorTree *DT) {
+ // Require a bottom-tested single-exit loop in LCSSA form. Simplify form gives
+ // the preheader, single latch and dedicated exits; the rest pin the exit to
+ // the latch, so the latch compare can be rewritten per partition.
+ if (!L->isLoopSimplifyForm() || !L->isLCSSAForm(*DT) ||
+ L->getExitingBlock() != L->getLoopLatch() || !L->getExitBlock()) {
+ LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << DEBUG_TYPE ": loop not in expected form\n");
+ return std::nullopt;
+ }
+
+ // The latch compare must exist and reside in the latch: it is rewritten in
+ // place, once per partition.
+ ICmpInst *LatchCmp = L->getLatchCmpInst();
+ if (!LatchCmp || LatchCmp->getParent() != L->getLoopLatch()) {
+ LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << DEBUG_TYPE ": latch compare not in the loop latch\n");
+ return std::nullopt;
+ }
+
+ // Exit values are unsupported. Look for an LCSSA PHI and for a use outside
+ // the loop: a token-like type cannot appear in a PHI, so LCSSA can leave a
+ // value escaping with no PHI to find.
+ if (!L->getExitBlock()->phis().empty()) {
+ LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << DEBUG_TYPE ": loop has exit values\n");
+ return std::nullopt;
+ }
+ if (!findDefsUsedOutsideOfLoop(L).empty()) {
+ LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << DEBUG_TYPE ": loop has exit values\n");
+ return std::nullopt;
+ }
+
+ // Guard-gated clones require isSafeToCloneConditionally().
+ if (!L->isSafeToCloneConditionally(*DT)) {
+ LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << DEBUG_TYPE ": loop not safe to clone conditionally\n");
+ return std::nullopt;
+ }
+
+ // A computable backedge-taken count fixes the iteration space we rebuild.
+ const SCEV *BTC = SE->getBackedgeTakenCount(L);
+ if (isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(BTC)) {
+ LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << DEBUG_TYPE ": loop trip count uncomputable\n");
+ return std::nullopt;
+ }
+
+ const SCEVAddRecExpr *IndAR = analyzeInduction(L, SE);
+ if (!IndAR) {
+ LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << DEBUG_TYPE
+ ": no unique unit-step integer induction\n");
+ return std::nullopt;
+ }
+
+ PHINode *Induction = L->getInductionVariable(*SE);
+
+ // Loop-carried values are unsupported: a later partition would have to resume
+ // the previous one's value, which needs SSA reconstruction. The induction is
+ // the exception, seeded per partition from its own start bound.
+ for (PHINode &HeaderPHI : L->getHeader()->phis())
+ if (&HeaderPHI != Induction) {
+ LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << DEBUG_TYPE ": loop has carried values\n");
+ return std::nullopt;
+ }
+
----------------
nema-ashutosh wrote:
Agreed, this is equivalent to “exactly one header PHI” after finding the IV. I kept the loop for consistency with other loop passes. Would you prefer if I switch this to range_size(Header->phis()) != 1 instead ?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/217232
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list