[llvm] [LV] Support tail-folded epilogue loops (PR #208764)

Hassnaa Hamdi via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Sep 9 04:54:16 PDT 2026


================
@@ -45,20 +45,44 @@ void VPlanTransforms::replaceWideCanonicalIVWithWideIV(
   if (!LoopRegion)
     return;
 
-  auto *WideCanIV =
-      findUserOf<VPWidenCanonicalIVRecipe>(LoopRegion->getCanonicalIV());
+  VPWidenCanonicalIVRecipe *WideCanIV = nullptr;
+  VPIRValue *StartValue = nullptr;
+  // VPWidenCanonicalIVRecipe is either a direct user of CanonicalIV or
+  // Add (CanonicalIV, resumeValue) (like the case for tail-folded epilogue).
+  for (auto *User : LoopRegion->getCanonicalIV()->users()) {
+    if (isa<VPWidenCanonicalIVRecipe>(User)) {
+      WideCanIV = cast<VPWidenCanonicalIVRecipe>(User);
+      StartValue = Plan.getZero(WideCanIV->getScalarType());
+      break;
+    }
+    if (isa<VPInstruction>(User)) {
+      auto *UserInstr = cast<VPInstruction>(User);
+      auto *It = find_if(UserInstr->users(), IsaPred<VPWidenCanonicalIVRecipe>);
+      if (It != UserInstr->user_end()) {
+        WideCanIV = cast<VPWidenCanonicalIVRecipe>(*It);
----------------
hassnaaHamdi wrote:

I think this statement: `find_if(UserInstr->users(), IsaPred<VPWidenCanonicalIVRecipe>);` already does that. It iterates over all the users of `User/UserInstr` to find if it's the Recipe.
Is that what you mean? or do you mean the Recipe could be **indirect** user of `User/UserInstr` ?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/208764


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list