[llvm] [X86] Fold AVX-512 sign-mask compares to MOVMSK (PR #216884)
Phoebe Wang via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Aug 19 23:22:33 PDT 2026
================
@@ -219,7 +221,44 @@ static bool isKMovNarrowing(unsigned VPMOVOpc, unsigned KMOVOpc) {
llvm_unreachable("Unknown KMOV opcode");
}
- return KMOVSize < VPMOVBits;
+ return KMOVSize < MaskBits;
+}
+
+static bool isZeroVector(const MachineInstr &MI) {
+ switch (MI.getOpcode()) {
+ case X86::VPXORrr:
+ case X86::VPXORYrr:
+ case X86::VXORPSrr:
+ case X86::VXORPSYrr:
+ return MI.getOperand(1).getReg() == MI.getOperand(2).getReg();
+ default:
+ return false;
+ }
+}
+
+static bool isAllOnesVector(const MachineInstr &MI, bool Is256Bit) {
+ switch (MI.getOpcode()) {
+ case X86::VPCMPEQDrr:
+ return !Is256Bit && MI.getOperand(1).getReg() == MI.getOperand(2).getReg();
+ case X86::VPCMPEQDYrr:
+ return MI.getOperand(1).getReg() == MI.getOperand(2).getReg();
+ default:
+ return false;
+ }
+}
+
+static MachineInstr *getSignMaskConstantDef(MachineInstr &MI, Register Reg,
+ bool IsZero, bool Is256Bit,
+ const TargetRegisterInfo *TRI) {
+ for (MachineInstr &DefMI : llvm::reverse(llvm::make_range(
+ MI.getParent()->begin(), MachineBasicBlock::iterator(MI)))) {
+ if (!DefMI.modifiesRegister(Reg, TRI))
+ continue;
+ return (IsZero ? isZeroVector(DefMI) : isAllOnesVector(DefMI, Is256Bit))
+ ? &DefMI
+ : nullptr;
----------------
phoebewang wrote:
Is this correct? When IsZero is true, return `isZeroVector(DefMI)`? The format also looks weird
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/216884
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list