[llvm] [EarlyIfConversion] Extend data dependent analysis across multiple blocks (PR #180623)
Jon Roelofs via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Aug 6 13:02:33 PDT 2026
================
@@ -925,31 +939,132 @@ static bool isConstantPoolLoad(const MachineInstr *MI) {
});
}
-/// Check if there are any calls in the range (From, To].
-static bool callInRange(const MachineInstr *From, const MachineInstr *To) {
- constexpr int MaxInstructionsToCheck = 64;
- int Count = 0;
- auto InstrRange =
- make_range(std::next(From->getIterator()), To->getIterator());
- return any_of(InstrRange, [&](const MachineInstr &MI) {
- return ++Count > MaxInstructionsToCheck || MI.isCall();
- });
+/// Check whether the load in From and the condition in To are far apart, i.e.
+/// whether a call or a loop can be executed between them. This is done by first
+/// scanning the instructions within From and To MBBs. If no call is found, we
+/// then scan all blocks which are dominated by From (the load) and can reach To
+/// (the condition), looking for calls and for blocks belonging to a loop the
+/// condition is not part of.
+bool EarlyIfConverter::hasCallOrLoopInRange(const MachineInstr *From,
+ const MachineInstr *To) {
+ if (From == To)
+ return false;
+
+ LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " checking for a call or loop between " << *From
+ << " and " << *To);
+ assert(DomTree->dominates(From, To) && "From is expected to dominate To");
+
+ const MachineBasicBlock *FromBB = From->getParent();
+ const MachineBasicBlock *ToBB = To->getParent();
+
+ unsigned NumScanned = 0;
+ auto HitSearchLimit = [&](unsigned N) {
+ NumScanned += N;
+ if (NumScanned <= MaxRegionInstrs)
+ return false;
+ LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " hasCallOrLoopInRange scanned more than "
+ << MaxRegionInstrs << " instructions\n");
+ return true;
+ };
+ auto FoundCall = [](const MachineInstr &MI) {
+ LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " found a call before the condition: " << MI);
+ return true;
+ };
+ auto IsCallOrHitSearchLimit = [&](const MachineInstr &MI) {
+ if (HitSearchLimit(1))
+ return true;
+ if (!MI.isCall())
----------------
jroelofs wrote:
I think you also need `MI.hasUnmodeledSideEffects() && MI.isInlineAsm()` checks, since I think what you're really checking for here is whether something might clobber a flags register.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/180623
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list