[llvm] [LV] Use wide lane masks as the canonical form when tail-folding & interleaving (PR #209484)
David Sherwood via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Aug 5 02:41:14 PDT 2026
================
@@ -1232,8 +1232,16 @@ class LLVM_ABI_FOR_TEST VPInstruction : public VPRecipeWithIRFlags,
// Creates a mask where each lane is active (true) whilst the current
// counter (first operand + index) is less than the second operand. i.e.
// mask[i] = icmpt ult (op0 + i), op1
- // The size of the mask returned is VF * Multiplier (UF, third op).
+ // The size of the mask returned is VF.
+ // When unrolled, ActiveLaneMask is duplicated.
----------------
david-arm wrote:
Is this still true given that WideActiveLaneMask is now the canonical form for unrolled, tail-folded loops? If `WideActiveLaneMask` isn't used as the canonical form for all loops, it would be good to explain in which scenarios unrolling using ActiveLaneMask occurs.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/209484
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list