[llvm] [Transforms][Utils] Test for branch weight preservation in LoopSplitUtils (PR #213647)
Ashutosh Nema via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Aug 3 04:16:36 PDT 2026
https://github.com/nema-ashutosh created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/213647
Added a lit test test for branch weight
>From c178157e2afe110cdcf82c6b0933f9b20bd14fa3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ashutosh Nema <ashu1212 at gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2026 16:43:35 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] [Transforms][Utils] Test for branch weight preservation in
LoopSplitUtils
---
.../Transforms/LoopSplit/branch-weights.ll | 67 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 67 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 llvm/test/Transforms/LoopSplit/branch-weights.ll
diff --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopSplit/branch-weights.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopSplit/branch-weights.ll
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..60c817e5306a8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopSplit/branch-weights.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py UTC_ARGS: --version 6
+; RUN: opt -passes=loop-split-utils -loop-split-points=50 -S < %s | FileCheck %s
+
+; The original latch carries branch weights; splitting must propagate them onto
+; each partition's clamped latch. The newly created partition guards have no
+; source profile, so in a profiled function they are marked with unknown
+; weights.
+
+define void @basic(ptr %a, i64 %n) !prof !0 {
+; CHECK-LABEL: define void @basic(
+; CHECK-SAME: ptr [[A:%.*]], i64 [[N:%.*]]) !prof [[PROF0:![0-9]+]] {
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[LS_GUARD0:.*:]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[SMAX:%.*]] = call i64 @llvm.smax.i64(i64 [[N]], i64 1)
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP0:%.*]] = add nsw i64 [[SMAX]], -1
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[SMIN:%.*]] = call i64 @llvm.smin.i64(i64 [[TMP0]], i64 49)
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[ITR_CHK:%.*]] = icmp sle i64 0, [[SMIN]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[ITR_CHK]], label %[[ENTRY:.*]], label %[[LS_GUARD1:.*]], !prof [[PROF1:![0-9]+]]
+; CHECK: [[ENTRY]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT: br label %[[LOOP:.*]]
+; CHECK: [[LOOP]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[I:%.*]] = phi i64 [ 0, %[[ENTRY]] ], [ [[I_NEXT:%.*]], %[[LOOP]] ]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[P:%.*]] = getelementptr i64, ptr [[A]], i64 [[I]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: store i64 [[I]], ptr [[P]], align 4
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[I_NEXT]] = add i64 [[I]], 1
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[ITR_CHK1:%.*]] = icmp sle i64 [[I_NEXT]], [[SMIN]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[ITR_CHK1]], label %[[LOOP]], label %[[EXIT:.*]], !prof [[PROF2:![0-9]+]]
+; CHECK: [[EXIT]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT: br label %[[LS_GUARD1]]
+; CHECK: [[LS_GUARD1]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[ITR_CHK2:%.*]] = icmp sle i64 50, [[TMP0]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[ITR_CHK2]], label %[[ENTRY_LS1:.*]], label %[[LS_FINAL_EXIT:.*]], !prof [[PROF1]]
+; CHECK: [[ENTRY_LS1]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT: br label %[[LOOP_LS1:.*]]
+; CHECK: [[LOOP_LS1]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[I_LS1:%.*]] = phi i64 [ 50, %[[ENTRY_LS1]] ], [ [[I_NEXT_LS1:%.*]], %[[LOOP_LS1]] ]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[P_LS1:%.*]] = getelementptr i64, ptr [[A]], i64 [[I_LS1]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: store i64 [[I_LS1]], ptr [[P_LS1]], align 4
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[I_NEXT_LS1]] = add i64 [[I_LS1]], 1
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[ITR_CHK3:%.*]] = icmp sle i64 [[I_NEXT_LS1]], [[TMP0]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[ITR_CHK3]], label %[[LOOP_LS1]], label %[[LS_EXIT1:.*]], !prof [[PROF2]]
+; CHECK: [[LS_EXIT1]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT: br label %[[LS_FINAL_EXIT]]
+; CHECK: [[LS_FINAL_EXIT]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret void
+;
+entry:
+ br label %loop
+
+loop:
+ %i = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %i.next, %loop ]
+ %p = getelementptr i64, ptr %a, i64 %i
+ store i64 %i, ptr %p
+ %i.next = add i64 %i, 1
+ %c = icmp slt i64 %i.next, %n
+ br i1 %c, label %loop, label %exit, !prof !1
+
+exit:
+ ret void
+}
+
+!0 = !{!"function_entry_count", i64 1000}
+!1 = !{!"branch_weights", i32 100, i32 1}
+;.
+; CHECK: [[PROF0]] = !{!"function_entry_count", i64 1000}
+; CHECK: [[PROF1]] = !{!"unknown", !"loop-split-utils"}
+; CHECK: [[PROF2]] = !{!"branch_weights", i32 100, i32 1}
+;.
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list