[llvm] [SLP][Revec] Consider revectorization of the following shuffle pattern (PR #206903)

[Sushant Gokhale via llvm-commits]

sushgokh wrote:

> It does not matter who wil generate the same instructions set, VectorCombiner or SLP vectorizer. If VC already supports it, no need to redo the same stuff in SLP. You can instead add some extra checks in PhaseOrdering to check that we're actually have a good result in the end.

ok thanks. Will close this. Thanks

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/206903