[llvm] [M68k] Fix build after removal of RegisterClasses pointer array (PR #207364)

via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Jul 3 03:06:52 PDT 2026


github-actions[bot] wrote:

<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->


:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code. :warning:

<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>

``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff origin/main HEAD --extensions cpp -- llvm/lib/Target/M68k/M68kRegisterInfo.cpp --diff_from_common_commit
``````````

:warning:
The reproduction instructions above might return results for more than one PR
in a stack if you are using a stacked PR workflow. You can limit the results by
changing `origin/main` to the base branch/commit you want to compare against.
:warning:

</details>

<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>

``````````diff
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/M68k/M68kRegisterInfo.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/M68k/M68kRegisterInfo.cpp
index af5e824b3..b9f205ca1 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/M68k/M68kRegisterInfo.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/M68k/M68kRegisterInfo.cpp
@@ -90,8 +90,7 @@ M68kRegisterInfo::getMaximalPhysRegClass(unsigned reg, MVT VT) const {
   // this physreg.
   const TargetRegisterClass *BestRC = nullptr;
   for (const TargetRegisterClass &RC : regclasses()) {
-    if ((VT == MVT::Other || isTypeLegalForClass(RC, VT)) &&
-        RC.contains(reg) &&
+    if ((VT == MVT::Other || isTypeLegalForClass(RC, VT)) && RC.contains(reg) &&
         (!BestRC ||
          (BestRC->hasSubClass(&RC) && RC.getNumRegs() > BestRC->getNumRegs())))
       BestRC = &RC;

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/207364


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list