[llvm] [M68k] Fix build after removal of RegisterClasses pointer array (PR #207364)
via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Jul 3 03:06:52 PDT 2026
github-actions[bot] wrote:
<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code. :warning:
<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>
``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff origin/main HEAD --extensions cpp -- llvm/lib/Target/M68k/M68kRegisterInfo.cpp --diff_from_common_commit
``````````
:warning:
The reproduction instructions above might return results for more than one PR
in a stack if you are using a stacked PR workflow. You can limit the results by
changing `origin/main` to the base branch/commit you want to compare against.
:warning:
</details>
<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>
``````````diff
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/M68k/M68kRegisterInfo.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/M68k/M68kRegisterInfo.cpp
index af5e824b3..b9f205ca1 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/M68k/M68kRegisterInfo.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/M68k/M68kRegisterInfo.cpp
@@ -90,8 +90,7 @@ M68kRegisterInfo::getMaximalPhysRegClass(unsigned reg, MVT VT) const {
// this physreg.
const TargetRegisterClass *BestRC = nullptr;
for (const TargetRegisterClass &RC : regclasses()) {
- if ((VT == MVT::Other || isTypeLegalForClass(RC, VT)) &&
- RC.contains(reg) &&
+ if ((VT == MVT::Other || isTypeLegalForClass(RC, VT)) && RC.contains(reg) &&
(!BestRC ||
(BestRC->hasSubClass(&RC) && RC.getNumRegs() > BestRC->getNumRegs())))
BestRC = &RC;
``````````
</details>
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/207364
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list