[llvm] [X86] Reimplement bundle alignment mode (PR #175830)
Fangrui Song via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sun Jun 14 19:22:26 PDT 2026
================
@@ -852,7 +916,144 @@ bool X86AsmBackend::padInstructionEncoding(MCFragment &RF,
return Changed;
}
+bool X86AsmBackend::padInstsBackward(SmallVectorImpl<MCFragment *> &Relaxable,
+ unsigned &RemainingSize) const {
+ bool Changed = false;
+ while (!Relaxable.empty() && RemainingSize != 0) {
+ auto &RF = *Relaxable.pop_back_val();
+ // Give the backend a chance to play any tricks it wishes to increase
+ // the encoding size of the given instruction. Target independent code
+ // will try further relaxation, but target's may play further tricks.
+ Changed |= padInstructionEncoding(RF, Asm->getEmitter(), RemainingSize);
+
+ // If we have an instruction which hasn't been fully relaxed, we can't
+ // skip past it and insert bytes before it. Changing its starting
+ // offset might require a larger negative offset than it can encode.
+ // We don't need to worry about larger positive offsets as none of the
+ // possible offsets between this and our align are visible, and the
+ // ones afterwards aren't changing.
+ if (mayNeedRelaxation(RF.getOpcode(), RF.getOperands(),
+ *RF.getSubtargetInfo()))
+ break;
+ }
+ Relaxable.clear();
+ return Changed;
+}
+
+// Peephole is a list of Fragments that ends with non-zero-sized
+// BoundaryAlignFragment. Most of the time it will be every instruction within a
+// bundle, but there can be a partial bundle if it has nops in the middle(e.g.,
+// align_to_end).
+bool X86AsmBackend::dividePadInBundle(const MCAssembler &Asm,
+ ArrayRef<MCFragment *> Peephole) const {
+ bool Changed = false;
+
+ // Last Fragment is either FT_Align or FT_BoundaryAlign
+ auto *LastF = Peephole.back();
+ unsigned RemainingSize =
+ Asm.computeFragmentSize(*LastF) - LastF->getFixedSize();
+
+ unsigned StartOffset = Asm.getFragmentOffset(*LastF);
+ unsigned EndOffset = StartOffset + RemainingSize;
+ auto BoundaryAlignment = Align(Asm.getBundleAlignSize());
+ bool CrossBoundary = (StartOffset >> Log2(BoundaryAlignment)) !=
+ ((EndOffset - 1) >> Log2(BoundaryAlignment));
+
+ if (CrossBoundary) {
----------------
MaskRay wrote:
No test exercises the `CrossBoundary` path. This block and the `else if (CrossBoundary && TailSize > 0)` arm at line 1011 are both count-0 under the `AlignedBundling` suite, even with `--x86-pad-max-prefix-size` — the multi-bundle pad redistribution is untested. Since this is the path the `fixupNeedsRelaxationAdvanced` ±`BundleAlignSize` headroom exists to protect, it warrants a test: an `align_to_end` group whose padding spans a bundle boundary under prefix padding.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/175830
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list