[llvm] [Valuetracking] Use all FPClasses ordering information for min/max (PR #199651)

[Niklas Ulvinge via llvm-commits]

================
@@ -173,3 +173,41 @@ bool llvm::cannotOrderStrictlyLessEq(FPClassTest LHS, FPClassTest RHS,
                                      bool OrderedZeroSign) {
   return cannotOrderStrictlyGreaterImpl(RHS, LHS, true, OrderedZeroSign);
 }
+
+FPClassTest llvm::orderedStrictlyLess(FPClassTest Mask, bool OrderedZeroSign) {
+  // Ignores NaN
+  Mask &= ~fcNan;
+  // Since the classes are ordered bits, we can get all classes which are
+  // smaller than all classes in Known by setting all trailing 0 bits to 1,
+  // and setting the other bits to 0.
+  // This is done by counting the number of trailing 0 bits and creating a
+  // mask based on that.
+  // For example: 0b1111000000 = fcPositive
+  //           -> 0b0000111111 = fcNegative | fcNan
+  FPClassTest NewMask = static_cast<FPClassTest>(
+      maskTrailingOnes<unsigned>(countr_zero<unsigned>(Mask)) & fcAllFlags);
+  // Remove NaNs
+  NewMask &= ~fcNan;
----------------
nulvinge wrote:

The previous error message reported by llvm-hackme:

> opt: ../llvm-project-pr/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/BitmaskEnum.h:137: constexpr std::underlying_type_t<Enum> llvm::BitmaskEnumDetail::Underlying(E) [with E = llvm::FPClassTest; std::underlying_type_t<Enum> = unsigned int]: Assertion `U <= Mask<E>() && "Enum value too large (or largest val too small?)"' failed.


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/199651