[llvm] [RFC][IR] InstructionListener: per-function instruction removal/RAUW notifications (PR #193198)

[Pankaj Dwivedi via llvm-commits]

================
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+//===- llvm/IR/InstructionListener.h - Per-function instruction listener --===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+//
+// This file declares InstructionListener, a per-function interface that
+// notifies analyses when an Instruction is removed from a Function or
+// RAUW'd (replaced with another value). Think of it as "a value handle to
+// many values" — a single per-function registration replaces one handle per
+// tracked value.
+//
+// Registration and deregistration happen automatically via RAII: the
+// constructor registers with a Function, and the destructor deregisters.
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#ifndef LLVM_IR_INSTRUCTIONLISTENER_H
+#define LLVM_IR_INSTRUCTIONLISTENER_H
+
+#include "llvm/Support/Compiler.h"
+
+namespace llvm {
+
+class Function;
+class Instruction;
+class Value;
+
+/// A per-function listener notified when an Instruction is removed from its
+/// parent BasicBlock or when an Instruction is RAUW'd.
+///
+/// Subclasses implement the callbacks by passing static functions to the
+/// constructor, which static_casts the listener back to the derived type.
+/// This avoids virtual dispatch overhead while preserving type safety.
+///
+/// Lifetime is managed via RAII: the constructor registers with the
+/// Function, and the destructor deregisters.
+class InstructionListener {
+public:
+  using CallbackT = void (*)(InstructionListener *, Instruction *);
+  using RAUWCallbackT = void (*)(InstructionListener *, Instruction *Old,
+                                 Value *New);
+
+private:
+  Function *F;
+  CallbackT Callback;
----------------
PankajDwivedi-25 wrote:

Yes, thanks for pointing.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/193198