[llvm] [lit] Use dbg instead of note for tool detection (PR #193662)

[Vitaly Buka via llvm-commits]

vitalybuka wrote:

> > > CI is not expected to use it, only during initial setup if there are issues. Then during normal operation it's not needed. So seems debug to me.
> > 
> > 
> > It's still not debugging lit, just debugging a CI setup. In the general case, it's probably not helpful, but that's true of most logs, until they do come in handy.
> 
> We still should have some reasonable expectation how likely they will be needed. Otherwise we endup t tracing each line, like bash -x.
> 
> And for particularity this I don't remember them maintaining our non trivial bots.

In other words there subjective threshold - useful or not. I claim they are not.
If you, or you know someone, where it's useful - fine. But keeping just in case is wrong to me.


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/193662