[llvm] [LoopVectorize] Improve Vectorization of Small Loops (PR #195823)
Jack Styles via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue May 5 08:47:58 PDT 2026
================
@@ -3023,9 +3033,37 @@ LoopVectorizationCostModel::computeMaxVF(ElementCount UserVF, unsigned UserIC) {
NoScalarEpilogueNeeded(MaxFactors.FixedVF.getFixedValue())) {
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LV: Picking a fixed-width so that no tail will "
"remain for any chosen VF.\n");
- MaxFactors.ScalableVF = ElementCount::getScalable(0);
+ ApplyVectorWidth(MaxFactors, MaxFactors.FixedVF.getFixedValue(), 0);
return MaxFactors;
}
+ // Allow cases where the ExactTC == VF + 1. VF can be any power of
+ // 2 between 2 and MaxVF.
+ //
+ // This produces 1 vector iteration, and 1 scalar iteration with
+ // no remainder. Later passes will eliminate the loop and leave
+ // straight-line code as the both iteration counts are statically known.
+ ElementCount ExactTC = getSmallConstantTripCount(PSE.getSE(), TheLoop);
+ if (EpilogueLoweringStatus == CM_EpilogueNotAllowedLowTripLoop &&
+ ExactTC && ExactTC.isFixed()) {
+ if (HasOneScalarIterationRemainder(
+ ExactTC, MaxFactors.FixedVF.getFixedValue())) {
+ LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LV: Picking a fixed-width with 1 scalar "
+ "iteration remainder.\n");
+ ApplyVectorWidth(MaxFactors, MaxFactors.FixedVF.getFixedValue(), 0);
+ return MaxFactors;
+ }
+ // If the maximum VF cannot produce 1 vector iteration + 1 scalar
+ // iteration, step down VF's to find one that can.
+ for (unsigned VF = MaxFactors.FixedVF.getFixedValue(); VF >= 2;
+ VF /= 2) {
+ if (HasOneScalarIterationRemainder(ExactTC, VF)) {
+ LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LV: Picking VF=" << VF
+ << " with 1 scalar iteration remainder.\n");
+ ApplyVectorWidth(MaxFactors, VF, 0);
----------------
Stylie777 wrote:
Yes, we want to avoid any scalar iterations. For interleaving this may introduce loops, as seen in `tc5_forced_ic2_vectorize`, but the main aim is to avoid a scalar loop, so only allow a VF that fits TC + 1.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/195823
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list