[llvm] [AA] No synchronization effects for never-escaping identified local (PR #193939)

[Eli Friedman via llvm-commits]

efriedma-quic wrote:

Is it legal to mark an argument to a parallel algorithm "captures(none)" if the function has appropriate synchronization and doesn't escape the pointer?  I guess that's okay?

I don't think I have any other concerns here.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/193939