[llvm] [BOLT][Passes] use ADT containers for instrumentation spanning tree. (PR #192289)

[via llvm-commits]

github-actions[bot] wrote:

<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->


:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code. :warning:

<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>

``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff origin/main HEAD --extensions cpp -- bolt/lib/Passes/Instrumentation.cpp --diff_from_common_commit
``````````

:warning:
The reproduction instructions above might return results for more than one PR
in a stack if you are using a stacked PR workflow. You can limit the results by
changing `origin/main` to the base branch/commit you want to compare against.
:warning:

</details>

<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>

``````````diff
diff --git a/bolt/lib/Passes/Instrumentation.cpp b/bolt/lib/Passes/Instrumentation.cpp
index 4a64cd490..3934dd6fe 100644
--- a/bolt/lib/Passes/Instrumentation.cpp
+++ b/bolt/lib/Passes/Instrumentation.cpp
@@ -411,8 +411,7 @@ void Instrumentation::instrumentFunction(BinaryFunction &Function,
   // Exit basic blocks are always instrumented so we start the traversal with
   // a minimum number of defined variables to make the equation solvable.
   std::stack<std::pair<const BinaryBasicBlock *, BinaryBasicBlock *>> Stack;
-  DenseMap<const BinaryBasicBlock *,
-                     SmallVector<const BinaryBasicBlock *>>
+  DenseMap<const BinaryBasicBlock *, SmallVector<const BinaryBasicBlock *>>
       STOutSet;
   for (auto BBI = Function.getLayout().block_rbegin();
        BBI != Function.getLayout().block_rend(); ++BBI) {

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/192289