[llvm] 60246dc - [InstCombine] Generalize zext(add X, -C) + C folding (#191723)

via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Apr 15 09:57:23 PDT 2026


Author: Maiowaa
Date: 2026-04-15T16:57:18Z
New Revision: 60246dc28d170447299babf2f14706a2156b5488

URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/60246dc28d170447299babf2f14706a2156b5488
DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/60246dc28d170447299babf2f14706a2156b5488.diff

LOG: [InstCombine] Generalize zext(add X, -C) + C folding (#191723)

This patch generalizes an existing InstCombine optimization:

  zext(X - 1) + 1 → zext(X)

to support arbitrary constants C:

  zext(X - C) + C → zext(X)

when X is known to be >= C using KnownBits analysis.

This avoids missed simplifications for non-unit constants while ensuring
correctness under wrap semantics.

Includes test coverage for:
- Positive case where the fold applies
- Negative case where the fold must not apply


### Correctness Proof

We consider the transform:

  zext(add(X, -C)) + C → zext(X)

under the conditions:
  1) X u>= C (unsigned comparison)
  2) C fits in the bitwidth of X (i.e., representable in NarrowBW bits)

The inner operation is performed in the narrower bitwidth n:

  add(X, -C) = (X - C) mod 2^n

Since X u>= C, the subtraction does not underflow, so:

  (X - C) mod 2^n = X - C

Applying zero extension:

  zext(X - C) + C = (X - C) + C = X

Thus:
  = zext(X)

---

### Alive2 Validation

The transform was validated using Alive2 with symbolic C.
The constraint that C fits in NarrowBW bits is modeled using llvm.ctlz,
and the precondition X u>= C is enforced via llvm.assume.

Alive2 verifies the transformation under these conditions:

https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/jCVPWr

Added: 
    

Modified: 
    llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineAddSub.cpp
    llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/add.ll

Removed: 
    


################################################################################
diff  --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineAddSub.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineAddSub.cpp
index 01d97484b090d..a7ba1592ad307 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineAddSub.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineAddSub.cpp
@@ -1005,13 +1005,21 @@ Instruction *InstCombinerImpl::foldAddWithConstant(BinaryOperator &Add) {
         Add, Builder.CreateBinaryIntrinsic(
                  Intrinsic::usub_sat, X, ConstantInt::get(Add.getType(), -*C)));
 
-  // Fold (add (zext (add X, -1)), 1) -> (zext X) if X is non-zero.
-  // TODO: There's a general form for any constant on the outer add.
-  if (C->isOne()) {
-    if (match(Op0, m_ZExt(m_Add(m_Value(X), m_AllOnes())))) {
-      const SimplifyQuery Q = SQ.getWithInstruction(&Add);
-      if (llvm::isKnownNonZero(X, Q))
-        return new ZExtInst(X, Ty);
+  // Fold (add (zext (add X, -C)), C) -> (zext X) if X u>= C.
+  // Truncate C to the narrow type to avoid mismatched width comparisons.
+  {
+    const APInt *InnerC;
+    if (match(Op0, m_ZExt(m_Add(m_Value(X), m_APIntAllowPoison(InnerC))))) {
+      unsigned NarrowBW = InnerC->getBitWidth();
+      if (C->isIntN(NarrowBW)) {
+        APInt NarrowC = C->trunc(NarrowBW);
+        const SimplifyQuery Q = SQ.getWithInstruction(&Add);
+        if (*InnerC == -NarrowC &&
+            (NarrowC.isOne()
+                 ? llvm::isKnownNonZero(X, Q)
+                 : computeKnownBits(X, &Add).getMinValue().uge(NarrowC)))
+          return new ZExtInst(X, Ty);
+      }
     }
   }
 

diff  --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/add.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/add.ll
index 780a0a7872365..4380491f07557 100644
--- a/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/add.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/add.ll
@@ -4901,3 +4901,59 @@ define <2 x i32> @ceil_div_vec_multi_use(<2 x i32> range(i32 0, 1000) %x) {
 declare void @use_i32(i32)
 declare void @use_vec(<2 x i32>)
 declare void @fake_func(i32)
+; Fold (add (zext (add X, -C)), C) -> (zext X) if X u>= C.
+; General case: C=4, X proven >= 4 via and+or.
+define i32 @zext_add_general_c4(i8 %x) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @zext_add_general_c4(
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[AND:%.*]] = and i8 [[X:%.*]], -8
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[OR:%.*]] = or disjoint i8 [[AND]], 4
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[R:%.*]] = zext i8 [[OR]] to i32
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret i32 [[R]]
+;
+  %and = and i8 %x, -8
+  %or  = or  i8 %and, 4
+  %inner = add i8 %or, -4
+  %z = zext i8 %inner to i32
+  %r = add i32 %z, 4
+  ret i32 %r
+}
+
+; Don't fold: C=260 doesn't fit in i8, even though -C truncated matches -4.
+define i32 @zext_add_no_fold_c260(i8 range(i8 4, 8) %x) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @zext_add_no_fold_c260(
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[TMP1:%.*]] = zext nneg i8 [[X:%.*]] to i32
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[R:%.*]] = or disjoint i32 [[TMP1]], 256
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret i32 [[R]]
+;
+  %inner = add i8 %x, -4
+  %z = zext i8 %inner to i32
+  %r = add i32 %z, 260
+  ret i32 %r
+}
+
+; Don't fold: outer C=5 and inner -C=-4 don't match.
+define i32 @zext_add_no_fold_mismatch(i8 %x) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @zext_add_no_fold_mismatch(
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[INNER:%.*]] = add i8 [[X:%.*]], -4
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[Z:%.*]] = zext i8 [[INNER]] to i32
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[R:%.*]] = add nuw nsw i32 [[Z]], 5
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret i32 [[R]]
+;
+  %inner = add i8 %x, -4
+  %z = zext i8 %inner to i32
+  %r = add i32 %z, 5
+  ret i32 %r
+}
+; Don't fold: symmetric pattern zext(X + C) + (-C) is not the same.
+define i32 @zext_add_no_fold_symmetric(i8 %x) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @zext_add_no_fold_symmetric(
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[INNER:%.*]] = add i8 [[X:%.*]], 4
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[Z:%.*]] = zext i8 [[INNER]] to i32
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[R:%.*]] = add nsw i32 [[Z]], -4
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret i32 [[R]]
+;
+  %inner = add i8 %x, 4
+  %z = zext i8 %inner to i32
+  %r = add i32 %z, -4
+  ret i32 %r
+}


        


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list