[llvm] [CoroEarly][IR] Clarify semantic of llvm.coro.end (PR #191752)
Weibo He via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Apr 13 02:21:15 PDT 2026
NewSigma wrote:
> > > How does this relate to #151067 ?
> >
> >
> > Since `llvm.coro.id` may capture the pointer to promise, I believe DSE must assume that `llvm.coro.id` could store that pointer into a global variable, and that `coro.end` might subsequently read from it. Currently, neither `coro.end` nor its parameters have any memory attributes defined.
>
> My question is, what's the relationship with #151067?
Sorry for not making this clear earlier. Before #151067, nothing could prevent DSE from erasing the store. However, after #151067, llvm.coro.end post-dominates the GRO conversion and acts as an optimization fence.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/191752
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list