[llvm] [LangRef] Specify semantics for non-byte-sized loads and stores (PR #180739)

[Nikita Popov via llvm-commits]

nikic wrote:

> I am very happy to see this. I noticed that vector specifies that its behavior is "unspecified (just like it is for an integral type of the same size)", which is now an incoherent statement since integral types are specified. Is it okay to simply drop the "un" in unspecified there now?

Yeah, this is supposed to cover vectors as well.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/180739