[llvm] [MCA] Use LLVM_DEBUG instead of direct NDEBUG check (NFC) (PR #189389)

[via llvm-commits]

github-actions[bot] wrote:

<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->


:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code. :warning:

<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>

``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff origin/main HEAD --extensions cpp -- llvm/lib/MCA/Support.cpp --diff_from_common_commit
``````````

:warning:
The reproduction instructions above might return results for more than one PR
in a stack if you are using a stacked PR workflow. You can limit the results by
changing `origin/main` to the base branch/commit you want to compare against.
:warning:

</details>

<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>

``````````diff
diff --git a/llvm/lib/MCA/Support.cpp b/llvm/lib/MCA/Support.cpp
index 5d42963fb..1f1f2ab8d 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/MCA/Support.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/MCA/Support.cpp
@@ -72,9 +72,8 @@ void computeProcResourceMasks(const MCSchedModel &SM,
     dbgs() << "\nProcessor resource masks:\n";
     for (unsigned I = 0, E = SM.getNumProcResourceKinds(); I < E; ++I) {
       const MCProcResourceDesc &Desc = *SM.getProcResource(I);
-      dbgs() << '[' << format_decimal(I,2) << "] " << " - "
-                        << format_hex(Masks[I],16) << " - "
-                        << Desc.Name << '\n';
+      dbgs() << '[' << format_decimal(I, 2) << "] " << " - "
+             << format_hex(Masks[I], 16) << " - " << Desc.Name << '\n';
     }
   });
 }

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/189389