[llvm] [llvm] Refactor llc to use OptTable (PR #187901)

via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sat Mar 28 13:23:33 PDT 2026


================
@@ -399,19 +497,79 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) {
   initializeScavengerTestPass(*Registry);
 
   SmallVector<PassPlugin, 1> PluginList;
-  PassPlugins.setCallback([&](const std::string &PluginPath) {
-    auto Plugin = PassPlugin::Load(PluginPath);
-    if (!Plugin)
-      reportFatalUsageError(Plugin.takeError());
-    PluginList.emplace_back(Plugin.get());
-  });
 
-  // Register the Target and CPU printer for --version.
-  cl::AddExtraVersionPrinter(sys::printDefaultTargetAndDetectedCPU);
-  // Register the target printer for --version.
-  cl::AddExtraVersionPrinter(TargetRegistry::printRegisteredTargetsForVersion);
+  LlcOptTable Tbl;
+  unsigned MissingArgIndex, MissingArgCount;
+  ArrayRef<const char *> ArgsArr = ArrayRef(argv + 1, argc - 1);
+  opt::InputArgList Args =
+      Tbl.ParseArgs(ArgsArr, MissingArgIndex, MissingArgCount);
 
-  cl::ParseCommandLineOptions(argc, argv, "llvm system compiler\n");
+  if (MissingArgCount) {
+    reportError("missing argument to option: " +
+                Twine(Args.getArgString(MissingArgIndex)));
+  }
+
+  if (Args.hasArg(OPT_help)) {
+    Tbl.printHelp(outs(), "llc [options] <input bitcode>",
+                  "llvm system compiler");
+    return 0;
+  }
+
+  RecordLlcOpts(Args, PluginList);
+
+  // Arguments not consumed by llc directly must be passed
+  // to the backend via cl::ParseCommandLineOptions. Unfortunately, this
----------------
PiJoules wrote:

Any particular reason to remove them? I could remove them but I would think it wouldn't be straightforward why we're still using `cl::` without them.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/187901


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list