[llvm] [CodeGen] Do not remove IMPLICIT_DEF unless all uses have undef flag added (PR #188133)
Jay Foad via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Mar 27 04:25:57 PDT 2026
================
@@ -102,29 +102,44 @@ void ProcessImplicitDefs::processImplicitDef(MachineInstr *MI) {
}
// This is a physreg implicit-def.
- // Look for the first instruction to use or define an alias.
- MachineBasicBlock::instr_iterator UserMI = MI->getIterator();
- MachineBasicBlock::instr_iterator UserE = MI->getParent()->instr_end();
- bool Found = false;
- for (++UserMI; UserMI != UserE; ++UserMI) {
- for (MachineOperand &MO : UserMI->operands()) {
+ // Try to add undef flag to all uses. If all uses are updated remove
+ // implicit-def.
+ MachineBasicBlock::instr_iterator SearchMI = MI->getIterator();
+ MachineBasicBlock::instr_iterator SearchE = MI->getParent()->instr_end();
+ bool ImplicitDefIsDead = false;
+ bool SearchedWholeBlock = true;
+ constexpr unsigned SearchLimit = 60000;
+ unsigned Count = 0;
+ for (++SearchMI; SearchMI != SearchE; ++SearchMI) {
+ bool DefinesReg = false;
+ if (++Count > SearchLimit) {
+ SearchedWholeBlock = false;
+ break;
+ }
+ for (MachineOperand &MO : SearchMI->operands()) {
if (!MO.isReg())
continue;
- Register UserReg = MO.getReg();
- if (!UserReg.isPhysical() || !TRI->regsOverlap(Reg, UserReg))
+ Register SearchReg = MO.getReg();
+ if (!SearchReg.isPhysical() || !TRI->regsOverlap(Reg, SearchReg))
continue;
- // UserMI uses or redefines Reg. Set <undef> flags on all uses.
- Found = true;
+ // SearchMI uses or redefines Reg. Set <undef> flags on all uses.
if (MO.isUse())
MO.setIsUndef();
----------------
jayfoad wrote:
Pre-existing issue but I am not sure this is safe if SearchReg is larger than Reg. E.g. after an implicit def of %al, this would mark a use of %eax as undef. But that seems wrong because not _all_ of %eax was undefined.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/188133
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list