[llvm] wasm: recognize `any_true` and `all_true` (PR #155885)

[Folkert de Vries via llvm-commits]

folkertdev wrote:

> So, maybe it sounds like SDAG needs a way of expanding using shuffles as well?

It looks like it does, but stops when the operation becomes legal. So you're saying that maybe we should continue past that point?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/e6789f94b9cb385e8dd339aa35f659fe47d76f49/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp#L12070-L12093




https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/155885