[llvm] [X86] Lower `minimum`/`maximum`/`minimumnum`/`maximumnum` using bitwise operations (PR #170069)

[via llvm-commits]

github-actions[bot] wrote:

<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->


:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code. :warning:

<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>

``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff origin/main HEAD --extensions cpp -- llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp --diff_from_common_commit
``````````

:warning:
The reproduction instructions above might return results for more than one PR
in a stack if you are using a stacked PR workflow. You can limit the results by
changing `origin/main` to the base branch/commit you want to compare against.
:warning:

</details>

<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>

``````````diff
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
index 61298b904..e7b36a380 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
@@ -29695,7 +29695,8 @@ static SDValue LowerFMINIMUM_FMAXIMUM(SDValue Op, const X86Subtarget &Subtarget,
   }
 
   EVT SVT = VT.getScalarType();
-  assert(VT.isFloatingPoint() && (SVT == MVT::f16 || SVT == MVT::f32 || SVT == MVT::f64) &&
+  assert(VT.isFloatingPoint() &&
+         (SVT == MVT::f16 || SVT == MVT::f32 || SVT == MVT::f64) &&
          "Unexpected type in LowerFMINIMUM_FMAXIMUM");
 
   bool IgnoreNaN = DAG.getTarget().Options.NoNaNsFPMath ||

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/170069