[llvm] [LV] Avoid SCEVChecks when IV update doesn't overflow (PR #171605)

Ramkumar Ramachandra via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Dec 11 02:31:06 PST 2025


artagnon wrote:

Thanks for the guidance: I'm finding it hard to reason about these checks, which was the reason for the incorrect generalization. I'm still confused about why we need IV update overflow checks when VF is not scalable: I factored out some existing logic and re-used it in the redo of the patch, and I'm not able to reason about it fully.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/171605


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list