[llvm] [LV] Transform to handle exits in the scalar loop (PR #148626)
Gaƫtan Bossu via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Nov 28 08:36:04 PST 2025
================
@@ -8216,6 +8221,15 @@ void LoopVectorizationPlanner::buildVPlansWithVPRecipes(ElementCount MinVF,
if (CM.foldTailWithEVL())
VPlanTransforms::runPass(VPlanTransforms::addExplicitVectorLength,
*Plan, CM.getMaxSafeElements());
+
+ // See if we can convert an early exit vplan to bail out to a scalar
+ // loop if state-changing operations (like stores) are present and
+ // an exit will be taken in the next vector iteration.
+ // If not, discard the plan.
+ if (!Plan->hasScalarVFOnly() && HandleEarlyExitsInScalarTail &&
+ !VPlanTransforms::runPass(
+ VPlanTransforms::handleUncountableExitsInScalarLoop, *Plan))
----------------
gbossu wrote:
>Generally speaking, as soon as we encounter an instruction in the scalar loop where we would do something different between a scalar loop and a vector loop, we clamp the VF range and produce separate plans
I think here we should also do something different between scalar VF and vector ones because the transformation only really makes sense for VF>1 (as IC>1 is forbidden later).
AFAIU, currently we can run the transformation on a VPlan which contains `VF=1` as well as vector VFs. Could the range be clamped to ensure the transform only runs for a plan with `VF>1`?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/148626
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list