[llvm] optimize `is_finite` assembly (PR #169402)

[via llvm-commits]

github-actions[bot] wrote:

<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->


:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code. :warning:

<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>

``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff origin/main HEAD --extensions cpp -- llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp --diff_from_common_commit
``````````

:warning:
The reproduction instructions above might return results for more than one PR
in a stack if you are using a stacked PR workflow. You can limit the results by
changing `origin/main` to the base branch/commit you want to compare against.
:warning:

</details>

<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>

``````````diff
diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp
index 14881913a..4bff63aae 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp
@@ -9125,8 +9125,8 @@ SDValue TargetLowering::expandIS_FPCLASS(EVT ResultVT, SDValue Op,
   else if ((Test & fcFinite) == fcFinite) {
     // finite(V) ==> (a << 1) < (inf << 1)
     //
-    // See https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/169270, this slightly shorter than
-    // the `finite(V) ==> abs(V) < exp_mask` formula used before.
+    // See https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/169270, this slightly
+    // shorter than the `finite(V) ==> abs(V) < exp_mask` formula used before.
     EVT ShVT = getShiftAmountTy(IntVT, DAG.getDataLayout());
     SDValue One = DAG.getConstant(1, DL, ShVT);
 

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169402