[llvm] [LoopUnroll] Introduce parallel accumulators when unrolling FP reductions. (PR #166630)
Florian Hahn via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Nov 24 05:52:02 PST 2025
================
@@ -220,6 +220,137 @@ exit:
ret i32 %res
}
+define float @test_fadd_reduction(ptr %a, i64 %n) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: define float @test_fadd_reduction(
+; CHECK-SAME: ptr [[A:%.*]], i64 [[N:%.*]]) {
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[ENTRY:.*]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP0:%.*]] = add i64 [[N]], -1
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[XTRAITER:%.*]] = and i64 [[N]], 1
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP1:%.*]] = icmp ult i64 [[TMP0]], 1
+; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[TMP1]], label %[[LOOP_EPIL_PREHEADER:.*]], label %[[ENTRY_NEW:.*]]
+; CHECK: [[ENTRY_NEW]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[UNROLL_ITER:%.*]] = sub i64 [[N]], [[XTRAITER]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: br label %[[LOOP:.*]]
+; CHECK: [[LOOP]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[IV:%.*]] = phi i64 [ 0, %[[ENTRY_NEW]] ], [ [[IV_NEXT_1:%.*]], %[[LOOP]] ]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[RDX_1:%.*]] = phi float [ -0.000000e+00, %[[ENTRY_NEW]] ], [ [[RDX_NEXT_1:%.*]], %[[LOOP]] ]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[RDX:%.*]] = phi float [ 0.000000e+00, %[[ENTRY_NEW]] ], [ [[RDX_NEXT:%.*]], %[[LOOP]] ]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[NITER:%.*]] = phi i64 [ 0, %[[ENTRY_NEW]] ], [ [[NITER_NEXT_1:%.*]], %[[LOOP]] ]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[GEP_A:%.*]] = getelementptr inbounds nuw float, ptr [[A]], i64 [[IV]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP2:%.*]] = load float, ptr [[GEP_A]], align 16
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[RDX_NEXT]] = fadd reassoc float [[RDX]], [[TMP2]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[IV_NEXT:%.*]] = add nuw nsw i64 [[IV]], 1
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[GEP_A_1:%.*]] = getelementptr inbounds nuw float, ptr [[A]], i64 [[IV_NEXT]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP3:%.*]] = load float, ptr [[GEP_A_1]], align 16
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[RDX_NEXT_1]] = fadd reassoc float [[RDX_1]], [[TMP3]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[IV_NEXT_1]] = add nuw nsw i64 [[IV]], 2
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[NITER_NEXT_1]] = add i64 [[NITER]], 2
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[NITER_NCMP_1:%.*]] = icmp eq i64 [[NITER_NEXT_1]], [[UNROLL_ITER]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[NITER_NCMP_1]], label %[[EXIT_UNR_LCSSA:.*]], label %[[LOOP]], !llvm.loop [[LOOP5:![0-9]+]]
+; CHECK: [[EXIT_UNR_LCSSA]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[RES_PH:%.*]] = phi float [ [[RDX_NEXT_1]], %[[LOOP]] ]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[IV_UNR:%.*]] = phi i64 [ [[IV_NEXT_1]], %[[LOOP]] ]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[RDX_UNR:%.*]] = phi float [ [[RDX_NEXT_1]], %[[LOOP]] ]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[BIN_RDX:%.*]] = fadd reassoc float [[RDX_NEXT_1]], [[RDX_NEXT]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[LCMP_MOD:%.*]] = icmp ne i64 [[XTRAITER]], 0
+; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[LCMP_MOD]], label %[[LOOP_EPIL_PREHEADER]], label %[[EXIT:.*]]
+; CHECK: [[LOOP_EPIL_PREHEADER]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[IV_EPIL_INIT:%.*]] = phi i64 [ 0, %[[ENTRY]] ], [ [[IV_UNR]], %[[EXIT_UNR_LCSSA]] ]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[RDX_EPIL_INIT:%.*]] = phi float [ 0.000000e+00, %[[ENTRY]] ], [ [[BIN_RDX]], %[[EXIT_UNR_LCSSA]] ]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[LCMP_MOD2:%.*]] = icmp ne i64 [[XTRAITER]], 0
+; CHECK-NEXT: call void @llvm.assume(i1 [[LCMP_MOD2]])
+; CHECK-NEXT: br label %[[LOOP_EPIL:.*]]
+; CHECK: [[LOOP_EPIL]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[GEP_A_EPIL:%.*]] = getelementptr inbounds nuw float, ptr [[A]], i64 [[IV_EPIL_INIT]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP4:%.*]] = load float, ptr [[GEP_A_EPIL]], align 16
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[RDX_NEXT_EPIL:%.*]] = fadd reassoc float [[RDX_EPIL_INIT]], [[TMP4]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: br label %[[EXIT]]
+; CHECK: [[EXIT]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[RES:%.*]] = phi float [ [[BIN_RDX]], %[[EXIT_UNR_LCSSA]] ], [ [[RDX_NEXT_EPIL]], %[[LOOP_EPIL]] ]
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret float [[RES]]
+;
+entry:
+ br label %loop
+
+loop:
+ %iv = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %iv.next, %loop ]
+ %rdx = phi float [ 0.0, %entry ], [ %rdx.next, %loop ]
+ %gep.a = getelementptr inbounds nuw float, ptr %a, i64 %iv
+ %1 = load float, ptr %gep.a, align 16
+ %rdx.next = fadd reassoc float %rdx, %1
----------------
fhahn wrote:
Could you also add a test with a different fast-math flag, to make sure we don't introduce additional accumulators in that case?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/166630
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list