[llvm] x86: fix musttail sibcall miscompilation (PR #168956)
Folkert de Vries via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sat Nov 22 11:52:57 PST 2025
================
@@ -2018,6 +2018,61 @@ SDValue X86TargetLowering::getMOVL(SelectionDAG &DAG, const SDLoc &dl, MVT VT,
return DAG.getVectorShuffle(VT, dl, V1, V2, Mask);
}
+// Returns the type of copying which is required to set up a byval argument to
+// a tail-called function. This isn't needed for non-tail calls, because they
+// always need the equivalent of CopyOnce, but tail-calls sometimes need two to
+// avoid clobbering another argument (CopyViaTemp), and sometimes can be
+// optimised to zero copies when forwarding an argument from the caller's
+// caller (NoCopy).
+X86TargetLowering::ByValCopyKind X86TargetLowering::ByValNeedsCopyForTailCall(
+ SelectionDAG &DAG, SDValue Src, SDValue Dst, ISD::ArgFlagsTy Flags) const {
+ MachineFrameInfo &MFI = DAG.getMachineFunction().getFrameInfo();
+
+ // Globals are always safe to copy from.
+ if (isa<GlobalAddressSDNode>(Src) || isa<ExternalSymbolSDNode>(Src))
+ return CopyOnce;
+
+ // Can only analyse frame index nodes, conservatively assume we need a
+ // temporary.
+ auto *SrcFrameIdxNode = dyn_cast<FrameIndexSDNode>(Src);
+ auto *DstFrameIdxNode = dyn_cast<FrameIndexSDNode>(Dst);
+ if (!SrcFrameIdxNode || !DstFrameIdxNode)
+ return CopyViaTemp;
----------------
folkertdev wrote:
The function always returns here in my tests so far, is there some sort of setup that isn't happening in the x86 backend?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/168956
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list