[llvm] [LoopFusion] Assert failure in the issue 80301 (PR #167837)

[Michael Kruse via llvm-commits]

Meinersbur wrote:

I don't think this is a proper solution. Removing assertions and using them for a tie-breaker will eventually get us to completely symmetric instances such as #166560. There is no reason that two abritary loops in the CFG that are not even sequential have to be found a sequential order for.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/167837