[llvm] Reland "RegisterCoalescer: Add implicit-def of super register when coalescing SUBREG_TO_REG" (PR #168353)
Benjamin Maxwell via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Nov 18 09:54:22 PST 2025
================
@@ -1935,6 +1954,80 @@ void RegisterCoalescer::updateRegDefsUses(Register SrcReg, Register DstReg,
if (DstInt && !Reads && SubIdx && !UseMI->isDebugInstr())
Reads = DstInt->liveAt(LIS->getInstructionIndex(*UseMI));
+ bool RequiresImplicitRedef = false;
+ if (!SubregToRegSrcInsts.empty()) {
+ // We can only add an implicit-def and undef if the sub registers match,
+ // e.g.
+ // %0:gr32 = INSTX
+ // %0.sub8:gr32 = INSTY // top 24 bits of %0 still defined
+ // %1:gr64 = SUBREG_TO_REG 0, %0, %subreg.sub32
+ //
+ // This cannot be transformed into:
+ // %1.sub32:gr64 = INSTX
+ // undef %1.sub8:gr64 = INSTY , implicit-def %1
+ //
+ // because the undef means that none of the bits of %1 are read, thus
+ // thrashing the top 24 bits of %1.sub32.
+ if (is_contained(SubregToRegSrcInsts, UseMI) &&
----------------
MacDue wrote:
Would it make sense to use a `SmallPtrSet<MachineInstr *>` for `SubregToRegSrcInsts` given it's main use is to check `is_contained`? That may scale better (given this is checked for each `UseMI`).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/168353
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list