[llvm] Introduction of typified section in ExtBinary format (PR #166553)

[Sergey Shcherbinin via llvm-commits]

SergeyShch01 wrote:

> As a thought experiment, if a new type associate new profile type to IR with current LBR anchors (`line:discriminator` or pseudo probe), how will the storage representation look like?

Do you think there can be issues w/ the strightforward approach? I was thinking about adding a new map to FunctionSamples  (for [anchor -> prof_value] correspondence).



https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/166553