[llvm] [Support] Simplify the continuation condition in encodeSLEB128 (NFC) (PR #165651)
via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Oct 29 22:33:54 PDT 2025
llvmbot wrote:
<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-support
Author: Kazu Hirata (kazutakahirata)
<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>
The boolean expression to determine if more bytes are needed for a
signed LEB128 value is quite complex:
!((((Value == 0 ) && ((Byte & 0x40) == 0)) ||
((Value == -1) && ((Byte & 0x40) != 0))))
This patch simplifies it to an equivalent expression using a ternary
operator, which is much easier to understand.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165651.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) llvm/include/llvm/Support/LEB128.h (+2-4)
``````````diff
diff --git a/llvm/include/llvm/Support/LEB128.h b/llvm/include/llvm/Support/LEB128.h
index 898b4ea1f19ab..4e2262fb15c56 100644
--- a/llvm/include/llvm/Support/LEB128.h
+++ b/llvm/include/llvm/Support/LEB128.h
@@ -29,8 +29,7 @@ inline unsigned encodeSLEB128(int64_t Value, raw_ostream &OS,
uint8_t Byte = Value & 0x7f;
// NOTE: this assumes that this signed shift is an arithmetic right shift.
Value >>= 7;
- More = !((((Value == 0 ) && ((Byte & 0x40) == 0)) ||
- ((Value == -1) && ((Byte & 0x40) != 0))));
+ More = Value != ((Byte & 0x40) ? -1 : 0);
Count++;
if (More || Count < PadTo)
Byte |= 0x80; // Mark this byte to show that more bytes will follow.
@@ -58,8 +57,7 @@ inline unsigned encodeSLEB128(int64_t Value, uint8_t *p, unsigned PadTo = 0) {
uint8_t Byte = Value & 0x7f;
// NOTE: this assumes that this signed shift is an arithmetic right shift.
Value >>= 7;
- More = !((((Value == 0 ) && ((Byte & 0x40) == 0)) ||
- ((Value == -1) && ((Byte & 0x40) != 0))));
+ More = Value != ((Byte & 0x40) ? -1 : 0);
Count++;
if (More || Count < PadTo)
Byte |= 0x80; // Mark this byte to show that more bytes will follow.
``````````
</details>
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165651
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list