[llvm] [llvm][UnifyLoopExits] Avoid optimization if no exit block is found (PR #165343)
via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Oct 27 19:15:02 PDT 2025
llvmbot wrote:
<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms
Author: Miguel Saldivar (Saldivarcher)
<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>
If there is not an exit block, we should not try unify the loops. Instead we should just return.
Fixes #<!-- -->165252
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165343.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/UnifyLoopExits.cpp (+4)
- (added) llvm/test/Transforms/Util/pr165252.ll (+15)
``````````diff
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/UnifyLoopExits.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/UnifyLoopExits.cpp
index 9f338dbc78cff..1163bfa5b795d 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/UnifyLoopExits.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/UnifyLoopExits.cpp
@@ -150,6 +150,10 @@ static bool unifyLoopExits(DominatorTree &DT, LoopInfo &LI, Loop *L) {
SmallVector<BasicBlock *, 8> ExitingBlocks;
L->getExitingBlocks(ExitingBlocks);
+ // No exit blocks, so nothing to do. Just return.
+ if (ExitingBlocks.empty())
+ return false;
+
// Redirect exiting edges through a control flow hub.
ControlFlowHub CHub;
for (auto *BB : ExitingBlocks) {
diff --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/Util/pr165252.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/Util/pr165252.ll
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..bab1a23c6ce57
--- /dev/null
+++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/Util/pr165252.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+; REQUIRES: asserts
+; RUN: opt -passes=unify-loop-exits -S %s
+
+define void @test() {
+entry:
+ br i1 true, label %end, label %Loop
+
+Loop:
+ %V = phi i32 [0, %entry], [%V1, %Loop]
+ %V1 = add i32 %V, 1
+ br label %Loop
+
+end:
+ ret void
+}
``````````
</details>
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165343
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list