[llvm] [AMDGPU] Use implicit operand to preserve liveness of COPY (PR #164911)
Matt Arsenault via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sun Oct 26 21:53:39 PDT 2025
arsenm wrote:
> LGTM in general. Is there a situation when it can be `implicit undef`?
Yes, it's representable
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/164911
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list