[llvm] [DAG]: Created method `m_SelectLike` to match `ISD::Select` and `ISD::VSelect` (PR #164069)
via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sat Oct 18 07:27:01 PDT 2025
llvmbot wrote:
<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-selectiondag
Author: None (kper)
<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/150019
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/164069.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) llvm/include/llvm/CodeGen/SDPatternMatch.h (+5)
- (modified) llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp (+21-18)
``````````diff
diff --git a/llvm/include/llvm/CodeGen/SDPatternMatch.h b/llvm/include/llvm/CodeGen/SDPatternMatch.h
index 201dc68de8b76..0dcf400962393 100644
--- a/llvm/include/llvm/CodeGen/SDPatternMatch.h
+++ b/llvm/include/llvm/CodeGen/SDPatternMatch.h
@@ -558,6 +558,11 @@ m_VSelect(const T0_P &Cond, const T1_P &T, const T2_P &F) {
return TernaryOpc_match<T0_P, T1_P, T2_P>(ISD::VSELECT, Cond, T, F);
}
+template <typename T0_P, typename T1_P, typename T2_P>
+inline auto m_SelectLike(const T0_P &Cond, const T1_P &T, const T2_P &F) {
+ return m_AnyOf(m_Select(Cond, T, F), m_VSelect(Cond, T, F));
+}
+
template <typename T0_P, typename T1_P, typename T2_P>
inline Result_match<0, TernaryOpc_match<T0_P, T1_P, T2_P>>
m_Load(const T0_P &Ch, const T1_P &Ptr, const T2_P &Offset) {
diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp
index c97300d64d455..c445a40ed3665 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp
@@ -2476,28 +2476,29 @@ static bool canFoldInAddressingMode(SDNode *N, SDNode *Use, SelectionDAG &DAG,
/// masked vector operation if the target supports it.
static SDValue foldSelectWithIdentityConstant(SDNode *N, SelectionDAG &DAG,
bool ShouldCommuteOperands) {
- // Match a select as operand 1. The identity constant that we are looking for
- // is only valid as operand 1 of a non-commutative binop.
SDValue N0 = N->getOperand(0);
SDValue N1 = N->getOperand(1);
+
+ // Match a select as operand 1. The identity constant that we are looking for
+ // is only valid as operand 1 of a non-commutative binop.
if (ShouldCommuteOperands)
std::swap(N0, N1);
- unsigned SelOpcode = N1.getOpcode();
- if ((SelOpcode != ISD::VSELECT && SelOpcode != ISD::SELECT) ||
- !N1.hasOneUse())
+ SDValue Cond, TVal, FVal;
+ if (!sd_match(N1,
+ m_SelectLike(m_Value(Cond), m_Value(TVal), m_Value(FVal))) ||
+ !N1->hasOneUse()) {
return SDValue();
+ }
// We can't hoist all instructions because of immediate UB (not speculatable).
// For example div/rem by zero.
if (!DAG.isSafeToSpeculativelyExecuteNode(N))
return SDValue();
+ unsigned SelOpcode = N1.getOpcode();
unsigned Opcode = N->getOpcode();
EVT VT = N->getValueType(0);
- SDValue Cond = N1.getOperand(0);
- SDValue TVal = N1.getOperand(1);
- SDValue FVal = N1.getOperand(2);
const TargetLowering &TLI = DAG.getTargetLoweringInfo();
// This transform increases uses of N0, so freeze it to be safe.
@@ -13856,12 +13857,13 @@ static SDValue tryToFoldExtendSelectLoad(SDNode *N, const TargetLowering &TLI,
Opcode == ISD::ANY_EXTEND) &&
"Expected EXTEND dag node in input!");
- if (!(N0->getOpcode() == ISD::SELECT || N0->getOpcode() == ISD::VSELECT) ||
- !N0.hasOneUse())
+ SDValue Cond, Op1, Op2;
+ if (!sd_match(N0,
+ m_SelectLike(m_Value(Cond), m_Value(Op1), m_Value(Op2))) ||
+ !N0->hasOneUse()) {
return SDValue();
+ }
- SDValue Op1 = N0->getOperand(1);
- SDValue Op2 = N0->getOperand(2);
if (!isCompatibleLoad(Op1, Opcode) || !isCompatibleLoad(Op2, Opcode))
return SDValue();
@@ -29617,12 +29619,13 @@ static SDValue takeInexpensiveLog2(SelectionDAG &DAG, const SDLoc &DL, EVT VT,
}
// c ? X : Y -> c ? Log2(X) : Log2(Y)
- if ((Op.getOpcode() == ISD::SELECT || Op.getOpcode() == ISD::VSELECT) &&
- Op.hasOneUse()) {
- if (SDValue LogX = takeInexpensiveLog2(DAG, DL, VT, Op.getOperand(1),
- Depth + 1, AssumeNonZero))
- if (SDValue LogY = takeInexpensiveLog2(DAG, DL, VT, Op.getOperand(2),
- Depth + 1, AssumeNonZero))
+ SDValue Cond, TVal, FVal;
+ if (sd_match(Op, m_SelectLike(m_Value(Cond), m_Value(TVal), m_Value(FVal))) &&
+ Op->hasOneUse()) {
+ if (SDValue LogX =
+ takeInexpensiveLog2(DAG, DL, VT, TVal, Depth + 1, AssumeNonZero))
+ if (SDValue LogY =
+ takeInexpensiveLog2(DAG, DL, VT, FVal, Depth + 1, AssumeNonZero))
return DAG.getSelect(DL, VT, Op.getOperand(0), LogX, LogY);
}
``````````
</details>
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/164069
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list