[llvm] [AMDGPU][Scheduler] Scoring system for rematerialization candidates (PR #153092)

Lucas Ramirez via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Oct 7 08:02:50 PDT 2025


================
@@ -1760,106 +1933,168 @@ bool PreRARematStage::canIncreaseOccupancyOrReduceSpill() {
                                               *DAG.TII))
         continue;
 
-      REMAT_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Region " << I << ": remat instruction " << DefMI);
-      RematInstruction &Remat =
-          Rematerializations.try_emplace(&DefMI, UseMI).first->second;
-
-      bool RematUseful = false;
-      if (auto It = OptRegions.find(I); It != OptRegions.end()) {
-        // Optimistically consider that moving the instruction out of its
-        // defining region will reduce RP in the latter; this assumes that
-        // maximum RP in the region is reached somewhere between the defining
-        // instruction and the end of the region.
-        REMAT_DEBUG(dbgs() << "  Defining region is optimizable\n");
-        LaneBitmask Mask = DAG.RegionLiveOuts.getLiveRegsForRegionIdx(I)[Reg];
-        if (ReduceRPInRegion(It, Reg, Mask, RematUseful))
-          return true;
-      }
-
-      for (unsigned LIRegion = 0; LIRegion != E; ++LIRegion) {
-        // We are only collecting regions in which the register is a live-in
-        // (and may be live-through).
-        auto It = DAG.LiveIns[LIRegion].find(Reg);
-        if (It == DAG.LiveIns[LIRegion].end() || It->second.none())
-          continue;
-        Remat.LiveInRegions.insert(LIRegion);
-
-        // Account for the reduction in RP due to the rematerialization in an
-        // optimizable region in which the defined register is a live-in. This
-        // is exact for live-through region but optimistic in the using region,
-        // where RP is actually reduced only if maximum RP is reached somewhere
-        // between the beginning of the region and the rematerializable
-        // instruction's use.
-        if (auto It = OptRegions.find(LIRegion); It != OptRegions.end()) {
-          REMAT_DEBUG(dbgs() << "  Live-in in region " << LIRegion << '\n');
-          if (ReduceRPInRegion(It, Reg, DAG.LiveIns[LIRegion][Reg],
-                               RematUseful))
-            return true;
-        }
-      }
-
-      // If the instruction is not a live-in or live-out in any optimizable
-      // region then there is no point in rematerializing it.
-      if (!RematUseful) {
-        Rematerializations.pop_back();
-        REMAT_DEBUG(dbgs() << "  No impact, not rematerializing instruction\n");
-      } else {
-        RematRegs.insert(Reg);
-      }
+      // Add the instruction to the rematerializable list.
+      RematRegSet.insert(Reg);
+      RematRegs.emplace_back(&DefMI, UseMI, DAG, MIRegion, RegionFreq);
     }
   }
 
-  if (TargetOcc) {
-    // We were trying to increase occupancy but failed, abort the stage.
-    REMAT_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Cannot increase occupancy\n");
-    Rematerializations.clear();
-    return false;
-  }
-  REMAT_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Can reduce but not eliminate spilling\n");
-  return !Rematerializations.empty();
+  return !RematRegs.empty();
 }
 
-void PreRARematStage::rematerialize() {
-  const SIInstrInfo *TII = MF.getSubtarget<GCNSubtarget>().getInstrInfo();
+PreRARematStage::RematReg::RematReg(
+    MachineInstr *DefMI, MachineInstr *UseMI, GCNScheduleDAGMILive &DAG,
+    const DenseMap<MachineInstr *, unsigned> &MIRegion,
+    ArrayRef<uint64_t> RegionFreq)
+    : DefMI(DefMI), UseMI(UseMI), UseRegion(MIRegion.at(UseMI)),
+      LiveIn(DAG.Regions.size()), LiveOut(DAG.Regions.size()),
+      Live(DAG.Regions.size()), DefFrequency(RegionFreq[MIRegion.at(DefMI)]),
+      UseFrequency(RegionFreq[MIRegion.at(UseMI)]) {
 
-  // Collect regions whose RP changes in unpredictable way; we will have to
-  // fully recompute their RP after all rematerailizations.
-  DenseSet<unsigned> RecomputeRP;
-
-  // Rematerialize all instructions.
-  for (auto &[DefMI, Remat] : Rematerializations) {
-    MachineBasicBlock::iterator InsertPos(Remat.UseMI);
-    Register Reg = DefMI->getOperand(0).getReg();
-    unsigned DefRegion = MIRegion.at(DefMI);
-
-    // Rematerialize DefMI to its use block.
-    TII->reMaterialize(*InsertPos->getParent(), InsertPos, Reg,
-                       AMDGPU::NoSubRegister, *DefMI, *DAG.TRI);
-    Remat.RematMI = &*std::prev(InsertPos);
-    DAG.LIS->InsertMachineInstrInMaps(*Remat.RematMI);
-
-    // Update region boundaries in regions we sinked from (remove defining MI)
-    // and to (insert MI rematerialized in use block). Only then we can erase
-    // the original MI.
-    DAG.updateRegionBoundaries(DAG.Regions[DefRegion], DefMI, nullptr);
-    auto UseRegion = MIRegion.find(Remat.UseMI);
-    if (UseRegion != MIRegion.end()) {
-      DAG.updateRegionBoundaries(DAG.Regions[UseRegion->second], InsertPos,
-                                 Remat.RematMI);
+  // Mark regions in which the rematerializable register is live.
+  Register Reg = DefMI->getOperand(0).getReg();
+  for (unsigned I = 0, E = DAG.Regions.size(); I != E; ++I) {
+    auto LiveInIt = DAG.LiveIns[I].find(Reg);
+    if (LiveInIt != DAG.LiveIns[I].end() && LiveInIt->second.any())
+      LiveIn.set(I);
+    auto LiveOutIt = DAG.RegionLiveOuts.getLiveRegsForRegionIdx(I).find(Reg);
+    auto LiveOutEnd = DAG.RegionLiveOuts.getLiveRegsForRegionIdx(I).end();
+    if (LiveOutIt != LiveOutEnd && LiveOutIt->second.any())
+      LiveOut.set(I);
+  }
+  Live |= LiveIn;
+  Live |= LiveOut;
+
+  // Store the register's lane bitmask.
+  unsigned SubIdx = DefMI->getOperand(0).getSubReg();
+  Mask = SubIdx ? DAG.TRI->getSubRegIndexLaneMask(SubIdx)
+                : DAG.MRI.getMaxLaneMaskForVReg(Reg);
+}
+
+MachineInstr *
+PreRARematStage::RematReg::insertMI(unsigned RegionIdx,
+                                    MachineBasicBlock::iterator InsertPos,
+                                    GCNScheduleDAGMILive &DAG) const {
+  MachineInstr *NewMI = &*std::prev(InsertPos);
+  DAG.updateRegionBoundaries(DAG.Regions[RegionIdx], InsertPos, NewMI);
+  DAG.LIS->InsertMachineInstrInMaps(*NewMI);
+  DAG.LIS->createAndComputeVirtRegInterval(NewMI->getOperand(0).getReg());
+  return NewMI;
+}
+
+unsigned PreRARematStage::ScoredRemat::getNumRegs(
+    const GCNScheduleDAGMILive &DAG) const {
+  // FIXME: this doesn't account for the fact that the rematerialization may be
+  // for a subregister. In that case we will overestimate the number of
+  // registers involved. This is acceptable since this is purely used for the
+  // scoring heuristic, but we should find a way to compute the number of
+  // registers actually covered by the register/subregister pair.
+  Register Reg = Remat->DefMI->getOperand(0).getReg();
+  const TargetRegisterClass &RC = *DAG.MRI.getRegClass(Reg);
+  return divideCeil(DAG.TRI->getRegSizeInBits(RC), 32);
+}
+
+unsigned PreRARematStage::ScoredRemat::getLatencyGain(
----------------
lucas-rami wrote:

Makes sense, removed it.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/153092


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list